By now, you’ve heard that comedian Gilbert Gottfried was fired as the voice of the AFLAC duck for his insensitive tweets following the earthquake and tsunami in Japan.
After reading the tweets, I thought “of course they fired him” and “how could he?” but then I remembered … he’s Gilbert Gottfried. He’s not exactly known for his family-friendly shtick.
Now, two days after they muted the duck, I’m wondering what AFLAC was thinking when they employed Gottfried as the voice in the first place.
When you hire someone to be the face or voice of your company, hiring criteria should extend far beyond the ability to quack.
Last week I received an unusual phone call. The woman on the other end of the phone had a request for me: she’d like my name … my Twitter username to be exact.
She proceeded to explain that she was calling on behalf of a fashion designer in NYC who shares my name, Kimberly Taylor. And as the publicist for said designer, she was experiencing difficulty with the “branding” because there was often confusion between her Twitter account and mine.
Admittedly, I had received a few misdirected tweets, but nothing to indicate that the Twittersphere was up in arms about the name confusion.
She went on to explain that “I’m just a person” and they’re working on a “brand.” I’m not sure about you, but I don’t think that’s the most convincing or endearing argument to make.
Furthermore, I wasn’t about to school another PR person about branding. Branding is more than just a name. A brand is a promise you make to your customer.
So, my questions to you are: What’s in a name? And, would you give yours up?
It was Thomas Edison who once said “I failed my way to success.”
That said, if you’ve been following any of the buzz lately about the unveiling of the new GAP logo, you’ll agree they have a long way to go.
Twitter, Facebook and design blogs continue to flood with dismay and negative feedback about this epic design faux pas, especially given the history and brand image the GAP has upheld for years.
Despite the negative buzz, we see heightened social media engagement on the topic through a paradoxal Twitter account @GapLogo – tagline “I have feelings, too. Jerks.” and their Facebook page serving as platforms for continued engagement on the topic encouraging discussions and a mass exchange of ideas. This has also sparked design competitions for incentives and has increased traffic substantially to blogs and other social media outlets. Here’s a tweet from UnderConsideration:
We see social media used by a major brand the way it should be. Showing the utmost transparency and engaging customers on a personal level. It’s quite brilliant actually.
Looking beyond the mayhem, this silver lining of engagement and level of consumer responsiveness reveal a heightened sense of brand loyalty. The fact that the GAP is uber-sensitive to this means that they are a few steps closer to finding a solution. Until then … “fail harder.”
I know a lot of bloggers have polls about thoughts on the logo. We get it; everyone hates it. But, what do you think should be done about this?
If you’ve spent even a short amount of time on Twitter or Facebook since June 11, chances are your tweet stream or Facebook wall have been all aflutter with one word: Gooooooaaaaaaall!
Ratings are up, Twitter is down … we probably haven’t seen this many fail whales since the King of Pop’s death (which, incidentally, happened a year ago this week).
Interaction, excitement and sheer fandom are through the roof. But, as I observe this new media success story, I can’t help but think it happened for one reason … it was organic.
Our firm has long been known as The Strategic Firm®, so don’t get me wrong, I strongly believe in strategy and social media is no exception, but sometimes it’s fun to sit back and watch what happens when it just … happens.
by Ashley Pinder *We’re not a religiously affiliated company, but we believe in analyzing the communication plans of any type of organization.
Leave it to the Pope to share solid strategic communications principles with the world.
Not only did news break recently that Pope Benedict XVI is urging priests to engage in social media using blogs and other audiovisual online tools to spread the Gospel, but it seems he’s providing some resources. Several Vatican partners already manage for the Pope a clearinghouse of shareable, downloadable tools like e-cards in several languages on Pope2you. (It’s a pretty extensive Web site from the Holy Father that incorporates a number of interactive social media platforms in one place.)
The Pope wants priests to foster friendship by connecting with new audiences online, using some of these tools.
“Priests present in the world of digital communications should be less notable for their media savvy than for their priestly heart, their closeness to Christ.”
Priests won’t be judged on how many Twitter followers they have or views their videos get on YouTube, but by their message and what’s in their heart. Maybe he thinks if they are transparent with their purpose, the benefits of getting involved online will come.
This principle is something we tell our clients at C&P all the time. You can’t just be “in social media.” You need a good business plan, a message and an objective for engaging.
I was passing a digital billboard on Interstate 4 the other day, and seriously considered violating traffic laws to get a cell phone photo of one of its revolving ads. I chose, however, not to risk life and limb for a fuzzy photo, so this post is visual-free.
So let me describe this simple, text-only ad, which was promoting the outdoor advertising company to those who are active on social media. The bold type encouraged drivers to “Friend Me!”
Not a bad idea in this day and age to engage in social media conversation. Minor problem, though. “Friend Me!” was followed by the company’s Twitter address.
Perhaps they figured that a Pied Piper-ish “Follow Me” message would encourage too many drivers to exit the highway immediately and search aimlessly for the next board. It’s more likely that they just got this one wrong.
If you want friends, fans and followers, make sure you know your terminology.
Fans and viewers everywhere began twittering away about Kanye West’s disorderly conduct at the MTV Video Music Awards.
We saw a visual representation of this as his profile picture bubble grew to enormous proportions on the VMA Twitter Tracker:
This dynamic tracker created by social media measurement company Radian6 and design firm Stamen, is a real – time visual display of users’ twittering activity on Twitter. In creating this tracker, they were able to translate complex statistical information into something visually pleasing and tangible that people can easily relate to. This is a powerful example of what happens when design and technology come together in an innovative and engaging way.
Another example of this is Flickr’s new clock … It’s a visual representation of recently uploaded videos arranged chronologically to give a broad look at what’s being posted in the Flickr community.
In these two examples, we see the critical role design plays in how we receive and interpret information especially on the Web and on social media platforms.
By finding new and creative approaches to design and visual communication we can inform, as well as engage and connect with our audiences.
So when great design and technology combine, we see form and function at its best.
With any new means of social conversation comes a set of unanswered questions about First Amendment rights. Last week’s Florida Public Relations Association of Orlando (FPRA) luncheon just happened to touch on that very issue. While the speakers were well-versed in all things First Amendment regarding published work, the spoken word, and the possible criminal penalties for defamation in either environment, they were less sure of the impacts on new media.
We all know that people have a right to their intellectual property, but what constitutes ownership in the Twitterverse or the Blogosphere? Especially when you only have 140 characters to share your thought and cite a source …
These issues are bound to come up more and more, in fact, just today the Associated Press reported that St. Louis Cardinals baseball manager Tony La Russa sued Twitter over a “fake page” responsible for several Tweets that caused him emotional distress and damaged his reputation. Who’s to blame for this? Twitter?
If you are engaging in the social media conversation make sure you are still giving credit where credit is due. And watch your back to avoid any suits against you or your company. If you have a question about copyright or Fair Use, just ask the U.S. Government, but I’d like to bet they have yet to lay out guidelines for every form of social media.
Maybe the best thing to do is be completely transparent. Here are some tips for an effective protocol from Mashable, a leader in all things social media: “10 Must-haves for your social media guide”.
I think we all know that this conversation is just warming up.
Although our views are often different, Leonard Pitts Jr. has always impressed me as one of the most open-minded op-ed writers in America. That is, until I read his recent column “I won’t twitter my life away” – in which he may have driven a wedge so thick between himself and the future – that he may never be “followed” by a generation that could really use his insight, attitude and knowledge. He is, after all, a prized possession at The Miami Herald a multiculture that thrives on the tweeting generation.
“I’m darned if I can see the fascination. I mean, I’m not surprised that technology allows this. But I am surprised that people – by the thousands – buy in to it,” wrote Pitts.
But what tweeters are saying in response explains it quite well. Perhaps he might also want to note that many of his colleagues in the newspaper business are regularly using twitter to snag scoops in their respective specialties and public relations people are following journalists to stay on top of what they are covering.
Oh, Leonard … this is very real and so is the need for people to reach out for some personal communication in an age where what technology has given us is cool and glitzy and wondrous but often very impersonal.
This may just make the Personal Computer personal again.
So sure, maybe John McCain’s foray into the world of Twitter came as part of his PR people telling him it was the “in” thing to do, but the 72-year-old senator’s page has been pretty full and regularly updated since starting on Jan. 23.
Albeit, most of the posts are shout-outs to his TV appearances on Larry King and Fox News (any good PR manager would utilize twitter for announcing coverage!), but recently, he wrote this gem on his twitter page:
What I love about this is how perfect the medium works with the message—each tweet creates a sense of a dramatic top ten unveiling—exactly what he was meaning to do. Even the character limitations force the writer to tweet pithy (and in McCain’s case—sarcastic) remarks unlike anything else in the social media blogosphere.
I have to admit, up until now, I’ve held somewhat of a grudge against Twitter and the banalities of everyday life that 80% of people tweet about (“went to the store” “took the kids to daycare,” “just saw Paul Blart: Mall Cop. It was okay.”).
I certainly wouldn’t have started to follow John McCain if he kept posting the same things he did in the beginning (“on my way to the floor,” “Heading to the Republican Policy lunch,” “Turn on CBS Evening News for my interview with Katie Couric”), but finding humor among even a politician’s micro-blog makes me a little more optimistic for what I’ll find out there.
As I’m writing this, McCain is currently updating a second top ten list “Back by popular demand.” Hope it’s as good as “$1.7 million for pig odor research in Iowa.”
Posted by thestrategicfirm 
